Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monografia | Biblioteca NMS|FCM | BOU1 TeseM-2017 | Presencial/Restrito | 20180105NL |
Dissertação de Mestrado, Política e Serviços de Saúde Mental, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
As a departure from theideological debate that has preoccupied French psychiatry since its inception, the French government has chosen for the first time in the field of mental health to implement an evidence--based intervention model incorporating powerful scientific research. The clinical trial of Housing First has permitted the scientific validation of the efficiency of this model in the French context. The second step is crucial: The implementation of the programme in 20 cities. It is an axiom of programme evaluation that an intervention is unlikely be effective if it is not implemented appropriately. If the effectiveness of any intervention depends in part on the quality of its implementation,this is particularly true for the Housing First model. In this work, we focus on this main question: In order to appropriately implement a validated model after an experimental phase, which evaluation tools can be used to evaluate and monitor whether an intervention has been implemented as planned? We first analyze the creation of the specifications.Then, new requirements are emerging, in particular evaluation and monitoring issues,which until now have been outsourced to the research teams. We shall thus see how a toolbox can be developed based on the specifications allowing these questions of evaluation and monitoring to be answered precisely with regard to two specific objectives: Respect for the intervention models, as well as maintaining the dynamic of appropriation of the programme by both professionals and users.
There are no comments for this item.